Peer Assessment of Group 1 - Project 2 Peer Assessment of Group 1


Category Group 2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5 Average
Topic and Paper Selection (0-15) 13 10 15 15 13.25
Synposis and Identification of Specific Problem (0-15) 13 11 15 11 12.25
Spectroscopy Section (0-10) 8 6 10 7 7.75
Format, Number and Types of Questions (0-10) 7 8 8 9 8
Quality of the Questions (0-20) 18 14 18 15 16.25
Presentation & Defense (0-20) 18 15 20 19 18
Overall Impression (0-10) 9 7 10 7 8.25
TOTAL 86 71 96 83 84




Evaluation by Group 2
(A) Evaluators
Group 2: JAW  Asitha, Wen and Jianzheng

(B) Evaluees 
Group 1,  Dissolved in Water

(C)Responses To Evaluation Categories

(1)  Topic and Paper Selection:       13
 This project comes from a top-notch research journal
(2)  Synopsis and Identification of Specific Problem       13
The introduction part is brief and understandable
(3)  Spectroscopy Section             8
The spectrum is clear.
(4) Format                                      7
Miss  reference part
(5) Quality of the Questions              18
The five question is helpful to understand the propose of the origin paper
(6) Presentation & Defense               18
The presentation was organized well 
(7) Overall Impression                    9
 A good web page design


Evaluation by Group 3



> (A) Group 3: Bible Study Class
> 
> (B) Group 1: Dissolved in Water
> 
> (C)
> 
>      (1). Topic and Paper Selection: 10 Points
> 
>      (2). Synposis and Identification of Specific Problem:  11 Points
> 
>      (3). Spectroscopy Section:  6 Points
> 
>      (4). Format, Number and Types of Questions: 8 Points
> 
>      (5). Quality of the Questions:  14 Points
> 
>      (6). Presentation and Defense:  15 Points
> 
>      (7). Overall Impression: 7 Points
> 
>  TOTAL POINTS:  71 Points
> 
Evaluation by Group 4
>a)Group 3, Sundeep Rayat/Dan Philips/Subhabrata Sen  (GROUP 4!!)
>b)Group 1, Emma Teuten/Paul Benny/Mike Lewis
>c)(1)The selected problem did meet the required criteria.15
>  (2)Synopsis and identification of specific problem.15
>  (3)Spectra well scanned.10
>  (4)Well formatted and typed.8
>  (5)Quality of questions were high.18
>  (6)Presentation was effective and the idea of putting the questions on
>the transparency was fine.20
>  (7)The selected problem could be assigned to the class.10
>  Total 96




Evaluation by Group 5
 A)  Group 5   Alcohol Protecting Group
     
     B)  Group 1   Dissolved in Water
     
     C) 
        1)  Topic and Paper Selection:   15
                fulfilled all requirements
     
        2)  Synposis and Identification of Specific Problem:    11
                unsure of significance beyond paper
     
        3)  Spectroscopy Section:    7
                spectra could be cleaner
                captions on spectra and figures would be helpful
                
        4)  Format, Number and Types of Questions:    9
                met requirements
     
        5)  Quality of Questions:    15
                question 1 was somewhat difficult
                question 5 - how does this relate to NMR?
     
        6)  Presentation & Defense:   19
                nice presentation - handled questions very well
     
        7)  Overall Impression:    6
                problem not too relevant to common NMR techniques taught
                in class