Peer Assessment of Group 3
Peer Assessment of Group 3
Evaluation by Group 31
Group #3 No Namers
1. Visual Appeal =9
2. Content =10
3. WWW Suitability =10
4. Relevance to 210 =8
5. Personal Gain =10
Total =47
Comments: Very interesting because it dealt with everyone's health.
However, it was not very apparent how it was relevant to 210.
Evaluation by Group 32
1. Group 32--Five Strangers
2. Group 3--Nonamers
3. Visual Appeal of Site: 7
4. Content: 8
5. WWW Suitibility: 8
6. Relevence: 10
Cholesterol, one of most widely known of organic substances.
7. Personal Gain: 8
Overall, an average site in layout; very good topic, not given as much
information and thought as it deserved. Very basic design.
Evaluation by Group 33
Group 3.
Visual appeal : 10
Content : 7
WWW Suitability : 10
Relevance to 210 : 8
Personal Gain : 8
Total : 43
The reason why we decided to give 'em only 7 points for content of a site
is because Andrew has found some major mistakes in what they wrote. Under
the paragraph , talking about McDonalds, there are some mistakes in the
information presented, especially in information about LDL level in a
body.
Evaluation by Group 34
Group 3
V-8
C-8
S-9
R-9
P-8
T-42
Evaluation by Group 35
Group #3
Visual Appeal-8
Content-9
WWW Suitability-10
Relevance to Chem 210-10
Personal Gain-10
Total-47
Comments: The page itself was great but some of the links weren't very
visually appealing