Peer Assessment of Group 2
Peer Assessment of Group 2
Evaluation by Group 31
Group #2 MDs2B
1. Visual Appeal =9
2. Content =10
3. WWW Suitablilty =10
4. Relevance to 210 =9
5. Personal Gain =10
Total =48
Comments: Very interesting setup,enjoyable to read with a lot of variety.
The relevancy to 210 was not very apparent though.
Evaluation by Group 32
1. Group 32--Five Strangers
2. Group 2--MDS2B
3. Visual Appeal of Site: 8
4. Content: 10
Excellent content of links, just haphazardly laid out...
5. WWW Suitibility: 8
6. Relevence: 10
Another obviously Organic Chemistry related topic; what could be more
organic than fats?
7. Personal Gain: 9
Interesting topic, that applies to anyone who eats snack food.
Evaluation by Group 33
Group 2
Visual appeal : 10
Content : 10
WWW Suitability : 10
Relevance to 210 : 8
Personal Gain : 8
Total : 46
It looks nice, the topic is good, but even though we are not supposed to
evaluate the group on their html file, but , frankly, we advise for a next
time to make the site more colorful, for intresting. But ,in whole, it
looks good.
Evaluation by Group 34
Rainer,
When I e-mailed in group 34's critiques of the web pages, I mistyped
your address and the email came back to me. So, here they are again:
Group 2
V-9
C-8
S-10
R-8
P-9
T-44
Evaluation by Group 35
Group#2
Visual Appeal-10
Content-9
WWW Suitability-10
Relevance to Chem 210-10
Personal Gain-10
Total-49
Comments: Great topic choice! Maybe the explanation of what Olestra
actually is could have been a little easier to understand.