Peer Assessment of Group 29
Peer Assessment of Group 29
Evaluation by Group 21
1. Evaluators: Group #21 - The Randoms
2. Evaluatees: Group #29 - Heineken
Visual Appeal 9
Content 8
WWW Suitability 10
Relevance to Chem 210 8
Personal Gain 9
Total 44
Evaluation by Group 22
Group 29:
1. 10
2. 9
3. 10
4. 9
5. 7
Total: 45
Comments: needed more cohesion, not sure how sites related to each other
Evaluation by Group 23
Professor Glaser,
Here is one of our evaluations
Evaluators group #23 The Magnificent DANAN
Nicole White
Darren Perry
we evaluated the group as follows:
Group #29 Heineken
Visual Appeal-10
*The sites and diagrams were superior and keep my attention complimenting
the text.
Content-10
*The text was interesting and each author seemed very knowledgeable.
WWW Suitability-9
*I believe that this is a very difficult question to answer but I feel
that the WWW allows for a lot of info to be obtained simultaneously making
it a superior medium.
Relevance to Chem 210-9
*Surprisingly to me this group did relate their topic to chemistry through
text and figures.
Personal Gain-10
*After seeing this site we felt that we had gained info which otherwise
would have been unknown.
Total- 48
Evaluation by Group 24
Commissioner Gordon:
Here is the Batsignal!!!!
Group 24 evulation of groups 26, 27, 29, 30
26 27 29 30
Visual 9 9 10 10
Content 9 9 9 10
WWW 9 10 9 9
Relevence 9 10 9 9
Personal Gain 8 8 8 9
Total 44 46 45 47
Comments:
Group 29: Perfumes seducing women makes the females of this group want
to smack someone. You need to hook up to the "Pornstars-Girls Girls
Girls" site with group 18. Be careful--your sites may, and have,
offended!
Now -OFF TO THE BATCAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!