Peer Assessment of Group 27
Peer Assessment of Group 27
Evaluation by Group 21
1. Evaluators: Group #21 - The Randoms
2. Evaluatees: Group #27 - Beerology 210
Visual Appeal 10
Content 10
WWW Suitability 10
Relevance to Chem 210 8
Personal Gain 8
Total 46
Evaluation by Group 22
Group 27:
1. 10
2. 10
3. 10
4. 8
5. 8
Total: 46
Comments: we were offended a the assumption that all college students
drink beer, but sites were good, perhaps could have been more relevant to
chem 210
Evaluation by Group 23
Evaluators group #23 The Magnificent DANAN
Nicole White
Darren Perry
we evaluated the group as follows:
Group #27 Beerology 210 (LSD-25)
Visual Appeal-10
*Very good visual appeal, several excellent sites which were very good
attention getters.
Content-9
*Diagrams were extremely helpful. There was almost too much information
to digest in one sitting.
WWW Suitability-9
*Some information may be available but the site brings it to you instead
of you going to it.
Relevance to Chem 210-10
*Concerted effort to show Chemistry through equations and pictures.
Personal Gain-9
*It was interesting and informative but there was almost too much info
which makes you start to lose interest after a while.
Total-47
Evaluation by Group 24
Commissioner Gordon:
Here is the Batsignal!!!!
Group 24 evulation of groups 26, 27, 29, 30
26 27 29 30
Visual 9 9 10 10
Content 9 9 9 10
WWW 9 10 9 9
Relevence 9 10 9 9
Personal Gain 8 8 8 9
Total 44 46 45 47
Comments:
Group 27: Batman and Robin failed to save Gothom City because Beerology
210 took too long to load up!
Now -OFF TO THE BATCAVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!