Peer Assessment of Group 22 Peer Assessment of Group 22


Category G16 G17 G18 G19 G20 Average
Visual Appeal 10 6 9 10 10 -
Content 10 8 9 10 10 -
WWW Suitability 10 8 8 9 10 -
Relevance to 210 10 8 7 9 10 -
Personal Gain 10 7 10 10 10 -
TOTAL from Peers 50 37 43 48 50 46
Technical Merit 50+15
TOTAL for GP 111




Evaluation by Group 16

(1) Group Number and Group Name of Evaluators

  Our group number is 16 and our group name is the broken beakers.

(2) Group Number and Group Name of Evaluees

The group we evaluated was group 22 and their name is BANGSNR


Visual appeal  10

Content  10

WWW Suitability  10
  
Relevance to 210  10

Personal Gain  10

Total from Peers  50 

Comments:  This was a very imformative site that had a lot of great links.
Good job!!!!  Great site.  The chemical structure site was groovy--we
liked it. One of your sites didn't work though.


Evaluation by Group 17
(1)	17, Catalytic Cretins
(2)	22, BANGSMHR
(3)	Visual appeal of site: 6
(4)	Content of site: 8
(5) 	WWW suitability: 8
(6)	Relevence to chem 210: 8
(7)	Personal gain: 7

Comments:  Mostly textual, graphics didn't grab us, very commercially
oriented.


Evaluation by Group 18
(1)  18, Six String

(2)  22, BANGHSMR

(3)  Visual Appeal of Site:  9 Points
We loved that gross picture of muscle!!!!   The pictures of the drug
were vere very colorful and catchy.

(4)  Content of Site: 9 Points 
The site contained information that gave an overall view of the drug.  It
was very organized and revealed a lot of information we had never known
before.

(5)  WWW Suitability:  8 Points
The project gave many opportunities to further the search to many
different sites.  It was nice for someone who likes to go all over the
web.

(6)  Relevance to Chem 210:  7 Points
Even though the the topic was very interesting, we felt like it was more
related to biology than Organic Chemistry.

(7)  Personal Gain:  10 Points
The topic was new to most of us.  The  information was very interesting
and very appealing.


					


Evaluation by Group 19
1) Group 19
        Brandon Larkin
        Mike Snyder
        Richard Aldenderfer
        Jason Effmann
        Raina Thomas
        Christie Hampton

2) Group 22
	Arthur, Betsy
	Gupta, Nita
	Nesbitt, Sara
	Rubach, Heidi

3) Visual Appeal of the Site: 10 points
Great color pictures and several color molecular models!

4) Content of Site:  10 points
Very useful information presented in a concise manner.  Alternative sites
about witches and such very interesting.

5) WWW Suitability:  9 points
Again, simply very good use of the Internet.  Several pictures,
alternative sites add interest and appeal.  One site would not load,
however.

6) Relevance to Chem 210: 9 points
Several easy to view models and chemical information.  Good job here,
also.

7) Personal gain:  10 points
Just a great site!  Very good information presented in a fine fashion.
Kept our interest peaked.  Great job!


Evaluation by Group 20
1.  Group 20 - psyched
2.  Group 22 BANGSNHR
3.  Visual appeal - score 10
Excellent use of graphics.
4.  Content - score 10
Good description of chemistry as well as physiological usage.
5.  Suitability -score 10
Great.  Nice multimedia use.
6.  Relevance - score 10
Good focus on chemical aspects.
7.  Gain - score 10.
Total = 50