Peer Assessment of Group 17
Peer Assessment of Group 17
Evaluation by Group 11
1) Evaluators- group 11, "Hot Wings"
2) Evaluees- group 17, "Catalytic Cretins"
3) visual appeal- 9
Not only was the homepage attractive, but the sites were also good. We
liked the molecule site.
4) content- 9
The range of information was broad.
5) www suitablity- 9
The group used all types of web sites
6) relevence to 210- 9
There was even a recipe for making the compound!
7) personal gain- 9
It was really informative and interesting although we never plan on
actually making Ecstacy
TOTAL SCORE: 45
Evaluation by Group 12
1. Group 12-Alkanetraz, 5 evaluators
2. Group 17-Catalytic Creatins
3. 10
4. 10
5. 9
6. 9
7. 9
We were very pleased with this site. The visual was great and the text
was also
appealing. Good Job!
Evaluation by Group 13
Group #17--Catalytic Cretins
1) Visual Appeal--10
2) Content--10
3) WWW Suitability--10
4) Relevance to Chem210--9
5) Personal Gain--9
Total=48
Comments: Nice visual site-not too extravagent. Just appealing,
informative, up to task.
Evaluation by Group 14
Evaluators- Group 14: Apocalypse
Evaluees- Group 17: Catalytic Cretins
Visual Appeal- 9
All of the sites provided contained interesting images and were fun
to explore.
Content- 8
The content was good. It displayed a fairly complete view of
ecstasy.
Suitability- 10
Things like the molecule pictures were extemely helpful and
definitely seemed best suited to the net. The whole project seemed well
integrated with the internet.
Relevance- 8
The relevance to chem 210 was easily seen through the links. Most
of the sites showed some direct relation.
Personal Gain- 8
The whole group learned a lot about ecstasy from this project.
Evaluation by Group 15
1) Group 15: The Unknowns
2) Group 17: Catalytic Cretins
3) Visual Appeal: 10
4) Content of Site: 10
5) WWW Suitability: 10
6) Relavance to Chem 210: 9
7) Personal Gain: 9
Total: 48
We liked the fish and the "high" artwork and your webpage in general.