Peer Assessment of Group 11
Peer Assessment of Group 11
Evaluation by Group 6
(1) Group 6-Chemical Activity
(2) Group 11-Hot Wings
(3) Visual Appeal of Site: 10
We found the citrus fruit site and 3-D picture very visually appealing.
(4) Content of Site: 10
Information provided by sites very useful and pertinent.
(5) WWW Suitability: 9
Although this site was visually appealing and informative, the information
could be obtained from other sources, but would not be as easily
accessible.
(6) Relevance to Chem 210: 9
Discussion of free radicals relevant to Chem 210.
(7) Personal Gain: 9
We felt the information provided by this Web page increased our health
conciousness.
Evaluation by Group 7
Dr. Glaser-
Here are the evaluations done by Group 7 Chem Tigers.
(1) Group #7 Chem Tigers
(2) Group #11 Hot Wings
(3) 9
(4) 9
(5) 10
(6) 9
(7) 9
Total: 46
Evaluation by Group 8
(1)Group 8 Freak Accident
(2)Group 11 Hot Wings
(3)Visual Appeal of Site:10 points
(4)Content of Site:9 points
did not have all required information (search mechanisms)
(5)WWW suitability:10
(6)relevance to chem 210:9 points
only evidence was picture of molecule, no text explanation
(7)Personal Gain:10 points
Evaluation by Group 9
(1) Group Number and Group Name of Evaluators- 9, The Pie Stars
(2) Group Number and Group Name of Evaluees- 11, Hot Wings
(3) Visual Appeal of Site: 8 points
(4) Content of Site: 9 points (contains a lot of material on your
subject)
(5) WWW Suitability: 10 points (Great visuals and info)
(6) Relevance to Chem 210: 7 points (not very relevant)
(7) Personal Gain: 10 points
Evaluation by Group 10
(1) Group 10 WESAYSO Inc.
(2) Group #11 Hot Wings
(3)Visual Appeal:7
The sites were a bit text heavy and needed more visual aids (graphs,
multimedia, etc...) The only visually appealing sites were not
specifically informative about vitamin C.
(4)Content: 10
Information was bountiful on the selective sites. Each supplied
detailed explanations about related topics to vitamin C.
(5)Suitability: 8
Not many of the sites were interactive, so most information could hav
eben found in books and magazines.
(6)Relevance:9
It would have been nice to have seen more sites dealing with the
actual"chemistry" of the molecule.
(7)Personal Gain: 8
Not much information was gained from the sites other than what seems to be
common knowledge.